Under Repeated Game Assumption, much narrower assumption is useful.
The operator and all end-users are in the same nation
The end-users must not use a Plasma which isn't settled in your legal territory
Same Territory Assumption has shown new #CryptoLaw horizon on Plasma construction.
However, when we extend this idea to exit game, even exit game seems like useless in front of law-enforcement.
Here we need clarification.
ref: WTF Is Fast Finalty?
Background
Plasma Finality is a main chain finality plus plasma block time. It is about few minutes.
We make Plasma finality time within 2s.
Bandwidth of fast finality
^^
Intoruduction
This is the way to share bandwidth of Plasma Plasma Fast Finality (Plasma FF).
This form is simillar to channel with multi participants.
Proposal
author
Relevant topic on ethresearch
He was implicitly mentioning about repeated game structure of the hub
On a shop
Physical existence: Face to face
Interaction time: 30~60sec
Transaction time: ~2sec
Service delivery: Synchronous confimation
The Fast Finality takes some gas cost for disputing
1 cent Tx is unprofittable for receiver to claim it
Does an operator have a motivation to act that attack?
#Plasma_Fast_Finality_(Plasma_FF)
1 doller shop
#gadgets #Plasma_Fast_Finality_(Plasma_FF)
Proof of non-inclusion enables the verification in FF dispute process.
That proof can be reverted by reorg. If a tx appeared to be included, pay backed compensation isn't valid and payer is to be double rewarded.
**!!This project is under development!!**
# Getting Started
Getting Started(https://github.com/cryptoeconomicslab/plasma-chamber/wiki/GettingStarted)
Wallet Document(https://cryptoeconomicslab.github.io/chamber-packages/wallet/)
Subscription model is tradition.
Payment and Access Control are the point.
What if payment cost is nearly zero?
Subscription doesn't have to be monthly tempo.
Shorter tempo means smaller loss of unpaid service.
Repeated Game Assumption of Plasma operator gives unique property to Plasma
Pros
Customers can trust&wait against a server fault despite it is withholding scenario (Plasma Cash variants only, MVP isn't)